نوع مقاله : مقاله ترویجی
نویسندگان
1 کارشناس ارشد حقوق خصوصی، دانشکده حقوق، دانشگاه شهید بهشتی. (نویسنده مسئول)
2 پژوهشگر دانشگاه فردوسی و دانش آموخته دانشگاه رضوی.
چکیده
کلیدواژهها
عنوان مقاله [English]
نویسندگان [English]
Termination of the contract is one of the effects that can be seen in many non-binding contracts. The question is, what causes might be the cause of such a situation? Sometimes the source of these matters is material and as a result, the contract is physically and practically unenforceable. Sometimes the implementation of the contract is not a problem physically and practically, but its implementation is hindered by the order of the legislator or legislator, which in such a situation, the source of the excuse is only a credit and legal aspect. Sometimes the source of the apology is personal; That is, for the parties to the contract or one of them, an incident occurs that leads to the exclusion of the contract. Certainly the effect of these causes on the status of the contract is not the same.Sometimes their effect is such that it forcibly dissolves the contract and sometimes exposes the contract so that the termination of the contract is due to the right of termination created by the excuse in favor of the parties or one of them. Is. This descriptive-analytical study seeks to accurately and logically categorize the above-mentioned reasons and analyze each in terms of its impact on the dissolution of the contract to properly explain the scope of dissolution of the disputed contracts.
کلیدواژهها [English]
)