In the criminal policy discourse about children and adolescents in our country, the adoption of a different criminal policy different from that of adults has been considered. However, the main influence of thinking of differential criminal policy for children and adolescents leads to cases such as the formation of a court and a special court for children and adolescents, the appealability of decisions and decisions of the court of children and adolescents, the filing of personality files, the appointment of a guardian ad litem and the mandatory presence of a consultant. and such cases. Article 31 of the Criminal Procedure Law approved in 2012 foresees the formation of a special police for children and adolescents, and its duties and powers are subject to the law. Article 29 of the Special Police Bill for Children and Adolescents introduces non-judicial methods of dealing with cases of violations of criminal laws by children and adolescents, family meeting and mediation. The research method of this article is qualitative and with a descriptive and analytical approach. Articles, books and websites can also be used as information gathering tools. The results of this article indicate the lack of provision of the necessary infrastructure for the fruitfulness and effectiveness of these methods and the lack of attention to other non-judicial methods common in leading countries in this field, such as sentencing in circles or circles and victim-offender meetings.